Record number
|
GP90
|
|
|
Identification
|
|
Simple name
|
gansey pattern
|
Full name
|
diamonds & double moss & vertical & indigenous
|
Other name
|
Eliza West's meshes and double moss gansey # 2
|
Named collection
|
|
Classified name
|
4.151.721
|
System
|
SHIC
|
Brief description
|
Gansey pattern, meshes and double moss gansey, knitted in Sheringham probably Eiza Tabitha West
|
|
|
Association
|
|
Nature
|
wearer
|
Person
|
fish merchant : West, Henry William (Harry Billy) (?)
|
Dates
|
1870 =
|
Address
|
Woodbine House, Cliff Road, Sheringham
|
Place
|
& Sheringham & Norfolk
|
Activity
|
fishing
|
Date
|
1900 = 1939 (estimate)
|
|
|
Production
|
|
Method
|
hand knitted
|
Person
|
knitter : West, Eliza Tabitha (née Little)
|
Dates
|
1876 = 1949
|
Date
|
1900 = 1939
|
Place
|
& Sheringham & Norfolk
|
Technical data
|
12 spi, 18 rpi
|
Note3
|
tension
|
Note3
|
Tension counted over 4 inches of plain knitting = 48 sts = 12 spi and 72 rows = 18 rpi
Aspect ratio by counting stitches = 0.67
|
Note
|
Not knitted by Mrs Annie Bishop, wife of Henry Bishop as it is too small to fit him (information from Jenny Payne née Bishop). Comparing aspect ratio with SHMMT : 2020.1.2: this gansey GP90 has an aspect ratio of 0.66 and GP38 is 0.61. Given
the differing aspect ratios, not likely to have been knitted by Mrs Bishop, wife of Robert ~Tar~ Bishop. . Twelve joins in the wool visible inside, so she was using small lengths of wool, perhaps odds and ends. Date uncertain but could be
early 20th century. Knitting errors: none that I could see. It is an extremely good piece of knitting.
|
Note
|
Now recognised as the work of Eliza Tabitha West. See pattern chart for evidence and justification behind this attribution.
|
Note
|
Two wavy light brown hairs (of the knitter?) knitted into the fabric; one on the left breast of the ~front~ yoke near the left shoulder, third mesh down; one in the right body seam below the gusset. One short white beard hair (wearer?), firmly
lodged in the yoke below the neck at the ~front~.
|
|
|
Preproduction
|
|
Simple name
|
gansey
|
Full name
|
|
Reference number
|
|
Note
|
Private collection.
|
|
|
Photography
|
|
Type
|
digitised image
|
|
|
|
GP90.jpg
|
|
|
Reproduction
|
|
Type
|
sampler
|
Corporate body
|
for :
|
Person
|
knitted by :
|
Date requested
|
|
Dimensions
|
|
|
|
Reproduction
|
|
Type
|
pattern chart
|
Person
|
charted by : Warren, Martin
|
Person
|
swatch knitted by :
|
Date requested
|
3.5.2023
|
|
|
|
GP90_chart.jpg
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Condition
|
excellent
|
Part:summary
|
: Small amount of fading at the neck. Five small points of damage, two 8 mm holes in one gusset that look like moth (mirror imaged, repaired by darning in black wool), one 4 mm hole in the other gusset (not repaired), one 3mm hole in a diamond
(third row down below shoulder strap, visible inside, repaired by darning in black), one nick on a cuff and one nick on the welt. Otherwise, perfect. Proof it is original and it has been worn.
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
: weight : 577 grams
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
chest : circumference : 35 inches
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
welt : height : 1 ¼ inches (k2 p2)
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
body below rigs : height : 9 inches
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
|
Part:dimen:reading
|
|
Part:summary
|
: Rigs 2 rounds purl, repeated 3 times; 3 rounds of plain between rigs. Pattern starts immediately (no plain row(s) above rigs). 11 columns of double moss 6 sts wide; 10 columns of ~double moss~ diamonds, eight diamonds high. Height of pattern
= 9.75 inches. Eight meshes x 24 rows = 192 rows. Tension by calculation = 19.7 rpi. Two rounds plain.
Divide for neck: four columns of diamonds (4 x 13), 3 columns of double moss (3 x 6 sts) = 52 + 18 = 70 sts. Shoulders: 4 columns double moss (4 x 6 sts), 3 diamonds of double moss (3 x 13 sts) = 24 + 39 = 63 sts. Total yoke width = 63 + 70 +
63 = 196 sts. False seam : 2 garter stitch 2 stocking stitch, 2 garter stitch = 6. Extra sts beside seams = 2 x 2 = 4 front and back. Height from top of body rigs to the shoulder graft 11~.
|
|
|
Documentation group
|
|
Class
|
pattern chart
|
Reference number
|
GP90_chart.pdf
|
|
|
Recorder
|
Warren, Martin :
|
|
|
Documentation group
|
|
Reference
|
|
Note3
|
|
Link
|
shering.html
|
|
|
Admin status
|
|
Status2
|
validated
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Note
|
Not knitted by Mrs Annie Bishop, wife of Henry Bishop as it is too small to fit him. Might have been knitted by Mrs Bishop, wife of Robert ~Tar~ Bishop. Comparing aspect ratio with SHMMT : 2020.1.2 Mrs Bishop~s gansey GP90 has an aspect ratio
of 0.66 and GP38 is 0.61. It is feasible that it was knitted by Mrs Robert Tar Bishop (Christian name not known). Twelve joins in the wool visible inside, so she was using small lengths of wool, perhaps odds and ends. Date uncertain but could
be early 20th century. Knitting errors: none that I could see. It is an extremely good piece of knitting.
|
Note
|
Two wavy light brown hairs (of the knitter?) knitted into the fabric; one on the left breast of the ~front~ yoke near the left shoulder, third mesh down; one in the right body seam below the gusset. One short white beard hair (wearer?), firmly
lodged in the yoke below the neck at the ~front~.
|
Note
|
The gansey was gifted to Mrs Snell, along with the 1969 edition of Gladys Thompson and a copy of Fishermen Knitting by Michael Harvey, by her next-door-neighbour Jenny Payne (10 New Street). Her mother was Audrey Chapman, née Bishop. Jenny~s
father was Henry? Bishop and we might suppose that this gansey was his but it is too small. It is exquisitely knitted in a Real McCoy 3 ply worsted (examined via a loose end inside) on fine needles and it is in excellent condition. It must be
one of the top handful of extant Sheringham ganseys, ranking with GP38 Mrs Bishop~s and GP39 Esther Nurse~s. Tension is 12 spi and 18 rpi and the pattern is columns of diamonds touching tip to tip in a kind of moss stitch similar to that used
by Esther Nurse in her hoop nets, alternating with columns of 6 sts of double moss. Whilst similar to some others it is a novel pattern to me. Information from Jenny Payne indicated that it was seen by a researcher in the 1960s or 1970s (who I
presume was Michael Harvey) and he took it away to study and returned what she thought was a reproduction had been knitted as a replacement but evidently it was actually the original. It appears to have been worn but only for best I think.
|
Note
|
|
Note
|
|
Note
|
|
|